12/17/2023 0 Comments Universals and particulars philosophy![]() 5, we put into question two of the basic principles Costa’s argument is based on. 4 we advance the idea that there is a tension between the polyhedric notion of ontological dependence and the notion of grounding, and we articulate a version of Aristotelianism about universals in terms of different kinds of dependence which again is immune from Costa’s argument. 3, granting the assumption that the notion of ontological dependence can be characterized in terms of grounding, we show that there are different and definitely promising formulations of Aristotelianism about universals which are immune from the charge presented by Costa. In the next section, we provide a reconstruction of the argument. The aim of this paper is both to assess Costa’s argument, by exploring how it can be resisted, and to shed light on some problems that arise in characterizing the notion of ontological dependence in terms of grounding. The argument, which has the merit of presenting a first precise formal formulation of the Aristotelian thesis, shows that this version of Aristotelianism about universals, together with some plausible principles about relations, exemplification and grounding, leads to contradiction. In a recent paper, Costa has put forward an argument against Aristotelianism about universals by relying on one precise formulation of the Aristotelian thesis, according to which the existence of a universal is grounded in its being exemplified by something (Costa 2019). The precise formulation of a consistent Aristotelian view of universals, however, is not an easy task, primarily due to the fact that the notion of ontological dependence involved in this view is far from being transparent. Democracy and Consensus: A Plea for a Non-Party Polityġ5.To be an Aristotelian about universals is to hold that universals depend for their existence on their exemplifiers. Philosophy and the Political Problem of Human Rightsġ4. The Need for Conceptual Decolonization in African Philosophyġ3. African Philosophical Tradition: A Case Study of the Akanġ0. The Concept of Truth in the Akan Languageĩ. Formulating Modern Thought in African Languages: Some Theoretical ConsiderationsĨ. Custom and Morality: A Comparative Analysis of Some African and Western Conceptions of Moralsħ. ![]() Universalism and Particularism in Religion from an African PerspectiveĦ. The Biological Foundation of Universal Normsĥ. A Philosophical Perspective on the Concept of Human CommunicationĤ. ![]() ![]() Introduction: The Universal and the ParticularĢ. Wiredu's exposition of the principles of African traditional philosophy is not purely theoretical he shows how certain aspects of African political thought may be applied to the practical resolution of some of Africa's most pressing problems.ġ. Drawing on aspects of Akan thought that appear to diverge from Western conceptions in the areas of ethics and metaphysics, Wiredu calls for a just reappraisal of these disparities, free of thought patterns corrupted by a colonial mentality. Wiredu asserts that universals, rightly conceived on the basis of our common biological identity, are not incompatible with cultural particularities and, in fact, are what make intercultural communication possible. Ghanaian philosopher Kwasi Wiredu confronts the paradox that while Western cultures recoil from claims of universality, previously colonized peoples, seeking to redefine their identities, insist on cultural particularities. "Wiredu's discussion of culturally defined values and concepts, as well as his attention to such timely issues as human rights, makes this book invaluable interdisciplinary reading." -D.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |